DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14483/25909398.22672Publicado:
2025-02-13Número:
Vol. 12 Núm. 12 (2025): Enero-diciembre 2025Sección:
Sección CentralConstruyendo Pedagogías de la Solidaridad Creativa
Building Pedagogies of Creative Solidarity
Construindo Pedagogias de Solidariedade Criativa
Palabras clave:
Solidaridad, pedagogía, producción cultural, circo (es).Palabras clave:
Solidarity, pedagogy, cultural production, circus (en).Palabras clave:
Solidariedade, pedagogia, produção cultural, circo (pt).Descargas
Resumen (es)
El autor considera el significando de la solidaridad, como una especie de práctica pedagógica. Tomando una foto de su niñez como punto de partida, sugiere que el llamado a la solidaridad funciona como un gancho subjetivo. Sin embargo, la práctica solidaria debería intentar desenganchar a los sujetos, creando espacios y oportunidades para ser otres. Para esto, es necesario construir una pedagogía de la solidaridad creativa basada en la producción cultural que busque crear oportunidades para la transformación tanto de las personas como de las relaciones. Esta práctica debe considerar los cinco registros en los que se expresa y desarrolla el trabajo cultural; el simbólico, el material, el espacio-temporal, el relacional, y el afectivo. El circo, como un espacio de producción cultural, podría generar oportunidades para esta pedagogía de la solidaridad creativa.
Resumen (en)
The author theorizes the meaning of solidarity as a kind
of pedagogical practice. Taking a photo from his childhood
as a point of departure, he argues that the call to
solidarity works as a kind of subjective hook. Yet, the
practice of solidarity should seek to unhook the subjects,
creating spaces and opportunities to be otherwise. To
that end, it is necessary to build a pedagogy of creative
solidarity based on the logic of cultural production that
seeks to create opportunities for transformation both
of the people and the relationships and conditions that
bring them together. Such a practice might consider five
registers through cultural work is expressed: the symbolic,
the material, the spatio-temporal, the relational, and
the affective. The circus, as a space of cultural production,
might generate opportunities for this pedagogy of
creative solidarity.
Resumen (pt)
O autor considera o significado da solidariedade como uma espécie de prática pedagógica. Tomando como ponto de partida uma fotografia da sua infância, ele sugere que o apelo à solidariedade funciona como um gancho subjetivo. Contudo, a prática solidária deve tentar desvincular os sujeitos, criando espaços e oportunidades para serem outros. Para isso, é necessária a construção de uma pedagogia da solidariedade criativa baseada na produção cultural que busque criar oportunidades de transformação tanto das pessoas quanto das relações. Esta prática deve considerar os cinco registos em que o trabalho cultural se expressa e se desenvolve; o simbólico, o material, o espaço-temporal, o relacional e o afetivo. O circo, como espaço de produção cultural, poderia gerar oportunidades para esta pedagogia de solidariedade criativa.
Referencias
Adelson, L. A. (2013). Futurity now: An introduction. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, 88(3), pp.213-218.
Ahmed, S. (2013). Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. Routledge.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quan-tum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Mea-ning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Batson, C., Malouin, H., Richmond, K., & Zajdlik, T. (2018). Freak and queer: Towards a queer circus, queer hat-chings, monsters in the cabinet, and queering circus ses-sions. Performance Matters, 4(1-2), pp.163-199.
Bayertz, K. (1999). “Four Uses of ‘Solidarity.’” In Solida-rity, ed. K. Bayertz, 3–28. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Bessone, I. (2020). Social circus as an organised cultural encounter embodied knowledge, trust and creativity at play. In Cultural Encounters as Intervention Practices (pp. 53-66). Routledge.
Boom, D. (2020, March 16). A pandemic of solidarity? This is how people are supporting one another as coro-navirus spreads. World Economic Forum. «https://www. weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/covid-19-coronavirus-so-lidarity-help-pandemic/»
Britzman, D. P. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: Toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. State Univer-sity of New York Press.
Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cumyn, M. (2010). “Responsibility for Another’s Debt: Surety, Solidarity, and Imperfect Delegation.” McGill J Law 55(2), pp.211–55. DOI: 10.7202/045085ar
Dean, J. (1996). Solidarity of strangers: Feminism after identity politics. University of California Press.
Digby, T. (2013). Men doing feminism. Routledge.
Dillon, G. & Marques, P. N. (2021). Taking the fiction out of science fiction: A conversation about Indigenous fu-turisms. E-flux Journal. «https://www.e-flux.com/jour-nal/120/417043/taking-the-fiction-out-of-science-fic-tion-a-conversation-about-indigenous-futurisms/»
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del Oprimido. Montevideo: Tierra Nueva.
Fricker, K., & Malouin, H. (2018). Introduction: Circus and Its Others. Performance Matters, 4(1-2), pp.1-18.
Gathogo, J. (2008). African philosophy as expressed in the concepts of hospitality and ubuntu. Journal of theo-logy for Southern Africa, 130, p.39.
Gauntlett, D. (2018). Making is connecting: The social power of creativity, from craft and knitting to digital everything. John Wiley & Sons.
Gaztambide Fernandez, R. (2010). Currículum y el reto de la diferencia. Paulo Freire: Revista de Pedagogía Críti-ca, 9(8), pp.21-32. «http://bibliotecadigital.academia.cl/xmlui/handle/123456789/1705»
Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2012). Decolonization and the pedagogies of solidarity. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education, & Society, 1(1), pp.41-67. «http://decolonization.org/index.php/des/article/view/18633»
Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2020). The orders of cultural production. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 35(3). «https://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/jct/article/view/939»
Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2021a). Ungrasping the Other: The Parent, the Child, and the Making of Solidari-ties. A Response to Esther Ohito. Occasional Paper Series, (45). DOI: «https://doi.org/10.58295/2375-3668.1412»
Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. (2021b). The trials of soli-darity: A defence. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 64(3), pp.302-314.
Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A., & Matute, A. A. (2013). “Pushing against”: Relationality, intentionality, and the ethical imperative of pedagogy. In Problematizing public pedagogy (pp. 52-64). Routledge.
Hall, S. (2011). Introduction: who needs ‘identity’? In Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 1-17). SAGE Publica-tions Ltd. «https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221907» hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. South End Press.
Klein, M. (1997). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946-1963. Random House.
Kolers, A. (2016). A moral theory of solidarity. Oxford University Press.
Lowe, L. (2015). The intimacies of four continents. Duke University Press.
Laitinen, A., & Pessi, A. B. (2014). Solidarity: Theory and practice. An introduction. In Solidarity: Theory and prac-tice, pp. 1-29. Lexington Books.
Mboti, N. (2015). May the real ubuntu please stand up? Journal of Media Ethics, 30(2), pp.125-147.
Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolo-nizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press.
Turner, V. (1969/1988). El Proceso Ritual, Estructura y An-tiestructura. (Spanish Translation) Altea Taurus Alfaguara.
Trapp, F. (2018). Disrupting the Binary of Otherness. A Semiotic Reading of the Performance L'autre by Claudio Stellato. Performance Matters, 4.
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace; Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden: Blacwkell.
Robitaille, M-A. (2024). Multiverse. Performance Abs-tract. «https://www.artemotion.org/artistasuno/blog-post-title-two-37drz»
Scholz, S. 2008. Political Solidarity. University Park: Pen-nsylvania State University Press
Simpson, L. (2008). Looking after Gdoo-naaganinaa: Pre-colonial Nishnaabeg diplomatic and treaty relationships. Wicazo Sa Review, 23(2), pp.29-42.
Smith, C., & Sorrell, K. (2014). On social solidarity. In The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social soli-darity: Formulating a field of study (pp. 219-247). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
Sorzano, O. (2018). Circus between centre and periphery: the recognition of the form in 21st century Britain and Co-lombia (Doctoral dissertation, City, University of London).
Sorzano, O. L. (2022). Colombia’s Cultural Explosion: Vivir Sabroso and Ollas Comunitarias as Pedagogies of Solida-rity. Educational Studies, 58(5-6), pp.657-677.
Stoddart, H. (2000). Rings of desire: Circus history and representation. Manchester University Press.
Sued Badillo, J. (2008). Agueybaná el bravo. San Juan: Ediciones Pueblo.
Zimmerman, R. 1996. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Visitas
Dimensions
PlumX
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Rubén Gaztambide-Fernández
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
