DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.18883Published:
2023-04-29Issue:
Vol. 28 No. 2 (2023): May-AugustSection:
Computational IntelligenceIncertidumbre epistémica y aleatoria en soft metrología: una perspectiva desde el aseguramiento de la validez de los resultados
Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Soft Metrology: A Perspective Based on Ensuring the Validity of Results
Keywords:
soft metrology, epistemic uncertainty, random uncertainty, learning machines (en).Keywords:
soft metrología, incertidumbre epistémica, incertidumbre aleatoria, máquinas de aprendizaje (es).Downloads
References
M. Vallejo, C. de la Espriella, J. Gómez-Santamaría, A. F. Ramírez-Barrera y E. Delgado-Trejos, “Soft metrology based on machine learning: A review,” Meas. Sci. Tech., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1-16, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab4b39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab4b39
L. Rossi, “Objectifying the subjective: Fundaments and applications of soft metrology,” en New Trends Developments in Metrology, L. Cocco, ed., London: IntechOpen, 2016, pp. 255-281. https://doi.org/10.5772/64123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/64123
“ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories,” International Organization for Standardization, 2017.
“Guide to the expression of measurement uncertainty,” Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM), 2008, pp. 1-142.
“Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 1 to the ‘Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’ — Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method,” Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM), 2008.
Y. Wang, S. Wang y C. Decès-Petit, “A Bayesian method for on-line evaluation of uncertainty in measurement of Coriolis flow meters,” Measurement, vol. 179, p. 109448, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109448
Y. Cheng, X. H. Chen, H. L. Li, Z. Y. Cheng, R. Jiang, J. Lü y H. D. Fu, “Analysis and comparison of Bayesian methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation,” Math. Prob. Eng., vol. 2018, no. 3, pp. 1-10, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7509046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7509046
J. D. Molina-Muñoz, L. F. Giraldo-Jaramillo y E. Delgado-Trejos, “Bayesian evaluation for uncertainty of indirect measurements in comparison with GUM and Monte Carlo,” Ing. Univ., vol. 26, pp. 1-26, Jul. 2022. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.iued26.beui DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.iued26.beui
T. Dietz et al., “Introducing multiobjective complex systems,” Eur. J. Operat. Res., vol. 280, no. 2, pp. 581-596, Jan. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.027
C. Cai, J. Wang y Z. Li, “Assessment and modelling of uncertainty in precipitation forecasts from TIGGE using fuzzy probability and Bayesian theory,” J. Hydrology, vol. 577, p. 123995, Oct. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123995 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123995
S. F. dos Santos y H. S. Brandi, “Application of the GUM approach to estimate uncertainty in measurements of sustainability systems,” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 493-505, Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1029-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1029-3
S. Vemulapalli y S. K. Venkata, “Soft sensor for an orifice flowmeter in presence of disturbances,” Flow Meas. Inst., vol. 86, p. 102178, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102178
J. Xu, D. Fu, L. Shao, X. Zhang y G. Liu, “A soft sensor modeling of cement rotary kiln temperature field based on model-driven and data-driven methods,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 27632-27639, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3116937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3116937
H. Roh et al., “Development of the virtual metrology for the nitride thickness in multi-layer plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition using plasma-information variables,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manu., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 232-241, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2018.2824314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2018.2824314
Z. He, J. Qian, J. Li, M. Hong y Y. Man, “Data-driven soft sensors of papermaking process and its application to cleaner production with multi-objective optimization,” J. Cleaner Prod., vol. 372, p. 133803, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133803
P. Kadlec, B. Gabrys y S. Strandt, “Data-driven soft sensors in the process industry,” Comp. Chem. Eng., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 795-814, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.12.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.12.012
W. Shao, W. Han, Y. Li, Z. Ge y D. Zhao, “Enhancing the reliability and accuracy of data-driven dynamic soft sensor based on selective dynamic partial least squares models,” Cont. Eng. Pract., vol. 127, p. 105292, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105292
L. Ren, T. Wang, Y. Laili y L. Zhang, “A data-driven self-supervised LSTM-DeepFM model for industrial soft sensor,” IEEE Tran. Ind. Inform., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 5859-5869, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3131471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3131471
J.-C. Ren, D. Liu y Y. Wan, “VMD-SEAE-TL-Based Data-Driven soft sensor modeling for a complex industrial batch processes,” Meas., vol. 198, art. 111439, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111439
Y. Liu y M. Xie, “Rebooting data-driven soft-sensors in process industries: A review of kernel methods,” J. Process Cont., vol. 89, pp. 58-73, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.03.012
M. J. Korczynski y A. Hetman, “A calculation of uncertainties in virtual instrument,” 2005 IEEE Inst. Meas. Technol. Conf. Proc., vol. 3, pp. 1697-1701, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.2005.1604459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.2005.1604459
X. Wenjun, F. Yuguang, Q. Liang y Y. Yunfeng, “Metrological methods for virtual instrument,” 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Comp. Sci. Autom. Eng., vol. 3, pp. 558-561, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAE.2011.5952740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSAE.2011.5952740
M. Mowbray et al., “Probabilistic machine learning based soft-sensors for product quality prediction in batch processes,” Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 228, p. 104616, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2022.104616
L. Frau, G. A. Susto, T. Barbariol y E. Feltresi, “Uncertainty estimation for machine learning models in multiphase flow applications,” Informatics, vol. 8, no. 3, Sep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8030058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8030058
L. Song, G. Wang y M. R. Brambley, “Uncertainty analysis for a virtual flow meter using an air-handling unit chilled water valeve,” HVAC&R Res., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 335-345, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2013.774890
H. Cheung y J. E. Braun, “A general method for calculating the uncertainty of virtual sensors for packaged air conditioners,” Int J. Refrig., vol. 63, pp. 225-236, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.06.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.06.022
S. Sediva y M. Havlikova, “Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo method for evaluation measurement uncertainty of indirect measurements,” en Proc. 14th Int. Carpathian Control Conf. (ICCC), pp. 325-329, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CarpathianCC.2013.6560563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CarpathianCC.2013.6560563
E. Hüllermeier y W. Waegeman, “Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: An introduction to concepts and methods,” Machine Learning, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 457-506, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-05946-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-05946-3
A. Der Kiureghian y O. Ditlevsen, “Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?,” Struct. Safety, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 105-112, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
M. Combalia, F. Hueto, S. Puig, J. Malvehy y V. Vilaplana, “Uncertainty estimation in deep neural networks for dermoscopic image classification,” en 2020 IEEE/CVF Conf. Comp. Vision Pattern Recog. Work. (CVPRW), 2020, pp. 3211-3220. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00380
V.-L. Nguyen, M. H. Shaker y E. Hüllermeier, “How to measure uncertainty in uncertainty sampling for active learning,” Machine Learning, vol. 11, pp. 89-122, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-06003-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-06003-9
A. Kendall y Y. Gal, “Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017). What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) (Vol. 2017-Decem, pp. 5575–5585). Long Beach, CA, USA.What uncertainties do,” 31st Conf. Neural Info. Proc. Syst. (NIPS 2017), vol. 2017, pp. 5575-5585, Mar.-Dec. 2017.
N. Tagasovska y D. Lopez-Paz, “Single-model uncertainties for deep learning,” en 33rd Conf. Neural Info. Proc. Syst. (NeurIPS 2019), 2019, pp. 1-12.
H. Al Osman y S. Shirmohammadi, “Machine learning in measurement part 2: Uncertainty quantification,” IEEE Inst. Meas. Mag., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 23-27, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2021.9436102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2021.9436102
K. Posch y J. Pilz, “Correlated parameters to accurately measure uncertainty in deep neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Neural Net. Learning Syst., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1037-1051, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2980004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2980004
A. Lakshminarayanan, B. Pritzel y C. Blundell, “Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles,” en 31st Conf. Neural Info. Proc. Syst., 2017, pp. 1-12.
E. Daxberger, A. Kristiadi, A. Immer, R. Eschenhagen, M. Bauer y P. Hennig, “Laplace redux - effortless Bayesian deep learning,” Adv. Neural Info. Proc. Syst., vol. 24, pp. 20089-20103, 2021. https://scopus.bibliotecaitm.elogim.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85131861907&partnerID=40&md5=675aa0e7c27940e7c1aa25272c0fdb09
R. Neal, Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0745-0
A. Olivier, M. D. Shields y L. Graham-Brady, “Bayesian neural networks for uncertainty quantification in data-driven materials modeling,” Comp. Meth. App. Mech. Eng., vol. 386, art. 114079, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114079
L. V. Jospin, H. Laga, F. Boussaid, W. Buntine y M. Bennamoun, “Hands-on Bayesian neural networks—A tutorial for deep learning users,” IEEE Comp. Intell. Mag., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 29-48, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2022.3155327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2022.3155327
R. Feng, “Uncertainty analysis in well log classification by Bayesian long short-term memory networks,” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., vol. 205, p. 108816, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108816
V. K. Kurmi, B. N. Patro, V. K. Subramanian y V. P. Namboodiri, “Do not forget to attend to uncertainty while mitigating catastrophic forgetting,” en 2021 IEEE Winter Conf. App. Comp. Vision (WACV), 2021, pp. 736-745. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV48630.2021.00078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV48630.2021.00078
Y. Gal y Z. Ghahramani, “Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: Representing model uncertainty in deep learning,” Proc. 33rd Int. Conf. Machine Learning, vol. 48, pp. 1050-1059, 2016.
P. D. Wentzell, C. Giglio y M. Kompany-Zareh, “Beyond principal components: A critical comparison of factor analysis methods for subspace modelling in chemistry,” Analyt. Meth., vol. 13, no. 37, pp. 4188-4219, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ay01124c DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1AY01124C
M. S. P. B. Ayhan, “Test-time data augmentation for estimation of heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainty in deep neural networks no title,” en 1st Conf. Med. Imaging Deep Learning, 2018, pp. 1-9.
G. Wang, W. Li, M. Aertsen, J. Deprest, S. Ourselin y T. Vercauteren, “Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks,” Neurocomp., vol. 338, pp. 34-45, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.103
Z. Liu y Z. Han, “Efficient uncertainty estimation for monocular 3D object detection in autonomous driving,” IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC, vol. 2021-Sep., pp. 2711-2718, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564433 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564433
J. Ali, P. Lahoti y K. P. Gummadi, “Accounting for model uncertainty in algorithmic discrimination,” in AIES 2021 - Proc. 2021 AAAI/ACM Conf. AI Ethics Soc., 2021 pp. 336-345. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462630
E. Redekop and A. Chernyavskiy, “Uncertainty-based method for improving poorly labeled segmentation datasets,” in 2021 IEEE 18th Int Symp. Biomed. Imaging (ISBI), 2021, pp. 1831-1835. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9434065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI48211.2021.9434065
C. Junhwan, O. Seokmin y B. Joongmoo, “Uncertainty estimation in AVO inversion using Bayesian dropout based deep learning,” J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., vol. 208, p. 109288, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109288
“JCGM 200:2012. International vocabulary of metrology – Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM),” Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM), 2012.
M. Vallejo, C. J. Gallego, L. Duque-Muñoz y E. Delgado-Trejos, “Neuromuscular disease detection by neural networks and fuzzy entropy on time-frequency analysis of electromyography signals,” Exp. Syst., vol. 35, no. 4, p. e12274, Aug. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12274
G. K. Nilsen, A. Z. Munthe-Kaas, H. J. Skaug y M. Brun, “Epistemic uncertainty quantification in deep learning classification by the Delta method,” Neural Net., vol. 145, pp. 164-176, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2021.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2021.10.014
Y. P. Paisan y J. P. Moret, “La repetibilidad y reproducibilidad en el aseguramiento de la calidad de los procesos de medición,” Tecnol. Quím., vol. 30, no. 2, Mar. 2010. https://tecnologiaquimica.uo.edu.cu/index.php/tq/article/view/994
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Valentina Agudelo-Cardona, Ingrid Natalia Barbosa, Marcela Vallejo, Nelson Bahamón-Cortés, Edilson Delgado-Trejos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
From the edition of the V23N3 of year 2018 forward, the Creative Commons License "Attribution-Non-Commercial - No Derivative Works " is changed to the following:
Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share the same: this license allows others to distribute, remix, retouch, and create from your work in a non-commercial way, as long as they give you credit and license their new creations under the same conditions.
2.jpg)
