DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.23565Published:
2025-11-23Issue:
Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): CALJ: july-decemberSection:
Research ArticlesRethinking Inclusion
English Language Teachers’ Representations Towards Functionally Diverse Students
Repensar la inclusión
Keywords:
diversidad funcional, derechos humanos, educación inclusiva, ESL, representaciones (es).Keywords:
ESL, functional diversity, Human Rights models, inclusive education, representations (en).Downloads
Abstract (en)
This article challenges the discourses and practices embedded in inclusive education in Colombia as enacted in policies and biological, social, and moral models of human rights. Drawing on critical disability theory, it unsettles the domesticated conceptualization of disability(ies) provided by inclusive teaching policies and deficitarian human rights-based models. This pedagogical stance enables the exploration of English language (EL) teachers’ representations of functionally diverse (FD) students in inclusive settings. The article grapples with contradictions in the educational system that render inclusionary practices, structure, terminologies stemmed from a pathologizing education of the FD children. These contradictions generate representational tensions, meanings, and implications for the teaching of English as a foreign language. The data collection instruments were semi-structured interviews, written narratives, and official texts. The findings suggest that EL teachers normalize and denaturalize inclusive discourses and deficit views derived from inclusive education. The study concludes that EL teachers resist and transform institutionalized inclusive practices through a pedagogical self-discovery, that is a EL personal discursive construction(s) situated within their views of inclusive education.
Abstract (es)
Este artículo cuestiona los discursos y prácticas arraigadas en la educación inclusiva en Colombia, tal como se promulgan en las políticas y los modelos biológicos, sociales y morales de los derechos humanos. A partir de la teoría critica de la discapacidad, se discute la conceptualización domesticada de la(s) discapacidad(es) que proponen las políticas de enseñanza inclusiva y los modelos deficitarios basados en los derechos humanos. Esta postura interpretativa permitió explorar las representaciones que tienen los docentes de inglés de los estudiantes con diversidad funcional en entornos inclusivos. El artículo aborda las contradicciones del sistema educativo que dan lugar a prácticas, estructuras y terminologías inclusivas derivadas de una educación que patologiza a los niños con diversidad funcional, generando tensiones de representación y significados, así como implicaciones para la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera. Los instrumentos de recolección de datos fueron entrevistas semiestructuradas, narrativas escritas y textos oficiales. Los resultados sugieren que los profesores normalizan y desnaturalizan discursos inclusivos y visiones deficitarias derivadas de la educación inclusiva. Como conclusión se plantea que los profesores de inglés se resisten y transforman las prácticas inclusivas institucionalizadas a través de un autodescubrimiento pedagógico, es decir, una construcción discursiva personal situada dentro de sus visiones de la educación inclusiva.
References
Aldana, Y. (2024). Amplifying English language teachers’ in-betweenness of their experiences in peace construction. Ñemityra revista multilingüe de lengua, sociedad y educación, 6(1), pp. 77-94. https://doi.org/10.47133/NEMITYRA20240601-A5
Barden, O., & Walden, S, J. (2021). The metanarrative of learning disability. In D. Bolt (Ed.), Metanarratives of disability culture, assumed authority, and the normative social order (pp. 77-93). Routledge.
Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge.
Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination. Hurst & Company, London.
Barrero, C. C. (2024). English Language Teachers’ Positions and Positionings Toward Functionally Diverse Students: A Narrative Study [Tesis de Maestria]. Universidad Distrital Francisco Jose de Caldas. http://hdl.handle.net/11349/92965
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory, a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
Clarke, M. (2008). The discursive construction of system of knowledge and belief. In V. Edwards (Ed.), Language teacher identities co-constructing discourse and community (pp. 105-135). Multilingual Matters.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, M. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Conde, R. (2014). Evolución del concepto de discapacidad en la sociedad contemporánea: de cuerpos enfermos a sociedades excluyentes. Praxis Sociológica, 18 155-175.
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Law 24, 1931. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?ruta=Leyes/1580132
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Decreto 1142 de 1978. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-102752.html
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Decreto 2082 de 1996. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?ruta=Decretos/1397091
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Decreto 470 de 2007. https://www.alcaldiabogota.gov.co/sisjur/normas/Norma1.jsp?i=27092
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Ley 115 de 1994. https://siteal.iiep.unesco.org/bdnp/189/ley-1151994-ley-general-educacion
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Ley 1346 de 2016. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=37150
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Ley 1618 de 2013. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=52081
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Ley 1620 de 2013. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?ruta=Leyes/1685356
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Ley 361 de 1997. http://www.secretariasenado.gov.co/senado/basedoc/ley_0361_1997.html
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Ley 762 de 1999. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=8797
Congreso de la república de Colombia. Sentencia C-293/10 del 2010. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2010/c-293-
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Dawn, R. (2021). The social model of disability in India politics of identity and power. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
De Jong, W.A., Kleijn, R. A. M., Lockhorst, D., Van Tartwijk, J. W.F., & Noordegraaf, M. (2023). Collaborative approaches: studying horizontal and vertical working relations in schools and how they relate to collaborative innovation practices. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research, 69(2), 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2296898
Denzin, N, K., & Lincoln, Y, S. (2018). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Elliott, J. (2005). Using narrative in social research. Sage Publications.
Evans, N. J., Broido, E. M., Brown, K. R., & Wilke, A. (2017). Disability in higher education: A social justice approach. Jossey-Bass.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press
Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English language education. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). (R, Hurley, Trans.). New York: Random House.
Gaertner, L., Dovidio, J., & Houlette, M. (2010). Social categorization. In J. Dovidio., M. Hewstone., P. Glick., & M. Esses (Eds.), The sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 527-543). Sage Publications.
Harre, R., & Davies, B. (1990). Positioning: The discursive of selves. The Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2019). Positioning theory in applied linguistics research design and applications. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kincheloe, J. (2008). Knowledge and critical pedagogy. Springer.
Merriam, S, B., Tisdell, J. E. (2016). Qualitative research a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN] (2009). Decreto 366 de 2009. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/article-182816.html
Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN] (2015). Decreto. 1075 de 2015. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/viewDocument.asp?ruta=Decretos/30019930
Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN] (2017). Decreto 1421 de 2017. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/normativa/Decretos/381928:Decreto-1421-de-agosto-29-de-2017
Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN] (2020). Guías y cartillas orientadoras. https://www.colombiaaprende.edu.co/recurso-coleccion/guias-y-cartillas-orientadoras
Ministerio de Educación Nacional [MEN]. (2022). Inclusión y equidad: hacia la construcción de una política de educación inclusiva para Colombia. https://siteal.iiep.unesco.org/bdnp/4302/inclusion-equidad-hacia-construccion-politica-educacion-inclusiva-colombia
Ministerio Social y Desarrollo Nacional.(1992). Declaración de Cartagena de Indias sobre políticas integrales para las personas con discapacidad en el área Iberoamericana. https://www.suin-juriscol.gov.co/legislacion/discapacidad.html
Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychalyse, son image et son public. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. Guilford Press.
Riddell, S., & Watson, N. (2014). Disability, culture and identity. Routledge.
Rioux, M., & Valentine, F. (2006). Does theory matter? Exploring the nexus between disability, human rights, and public policy. In D. Pothier & R. Devlin (Eds.), Critical disability theory (pp.48-69). UBCPress.
Romañach, J., & Palacios, A. (2008). El modelo de la diversidad: Una visión de la bioética desde la perspectiva de las personas con diversidad funcional (discapacidad). Intersticios revista sociológica de pensamiento crítico, 2(2),37-47.
Secretaria de Educación Bogotá. (2018). Lineamiento de política de educación inclusiva. https://repositoriosed.educacionbogota.edu.co/entities/publication/fd4cae48-2661-4813-892b-d214673da6d4
Secretaria de Educación Bogotá. (2020). Plan individual de ajustes razonables-PIAR.
Shildrick, M. (2012). Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In N. Watson., A. Roulstone., & S. Vehmas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 72-88). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Siebers, T. (2008). Disability theory. University of Michigan Press.
Tremain, S. (2005). Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory. University of Michigan Press.
United Nations. (1948). Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights#:~:text=Article%2026,on%20the%20basis%20of%20merit.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on rights of persons with disabilities. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities
Vlachou-Balafouti, A. (2013). The process of change and the politics of resistance in educational contexts: the case of disability. In L. Barton (Eds.), Disability, politics & the struggle for change (pp. 111-125). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Wagner, W., Kello, K., & Rammer, A. (2018). Making social objects: The theory of social representation. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook sociocultural psychology (pp. 130-147). Cambridge University Press.
Waldschmidt, A. (2005). Who is normal? Who is deviant? “Normality” and “risk” in genetic diagnostics and counseling. In S. Lynn (Eds.), Foucault and the government of disability (pp. 191-207). Michigan Press.
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
Metrics
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cristhian Camilo Barrero Rico

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
The journal allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Also, The Colombian Apllied Linguistics Journal will allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.






