Preparing Net Gen pre-service teachers for digital native classrooms

Educación inicial de profesores de la generación.Net para aulas de nativos digitales

  • Valentin Ekiaka Nzai Texas A&M University - Kingsville
  • Yu-Lin Feng Texas A&M University - Kingsville
  • Concepción Reyna
Keywords: Educational technology, cyberlearning workstations, technology integration, cyberlearning, pre-service teachers, Net Gen (en_US)
Keywords: ciber-aprendizaje, estaciones de trabajo de ciber-aprendizaje, tecnología educativa, profesores formación de la generación en red, integración de tecnologías (es_ES)

Abstract (en_US)

This paper explores Net Gen pre-service teachers’ perspectives of future digital native classrooms based on the National Education Technology Plan (U.S. Department of Education, 2010). Participants were seven Net Gen pre-service teachers enrolled in a semester-long laboratory of practice project for Literacy Development for English Language Learners. Data were collected using a narrative strategy (Ginsburg, cited in Riessman, 1993) which consisted of analyzing information from participants’ life stories produced during two audiotaped focus group conversations. Findings showed that pre-service teachers had positive perceptions and beliefs toward the laboratory of practices based on the experimental cyberlearning workstation framework designed by the authors. The hands-on experiences helped them enhance their digital native-like citizenship in order to meet future students’ individual abilities and learning styles, and to encourage teaching with digital technologies. Some recommendations and limitations are also addressed.

Abstract (es_ES)

Este artículo explora las perspectivas de profesores de la generación en red en formación sobre futuras aulas de nativos digitales, basadas en el Plan de Educación Tecnológica Nacional (Departamento de Educación de Estados Unidos, 2010). Los participantes fueron siete futuros docentes de la generación en red, inscritos en un laboratorio de un semestre de duración del proyecto de práctica para el Desarrollo de la Alfabetización para estudiantes del idioma inglés. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de una estrategia narrativa (Ginsburg, citado en Riessman, 1993), que consistía en analizar la información de las historias de vida de los participantes, producidas en dos conversaciones grabadas en video con grupos focales. Los resultados mostraron que los profesores en formación tenían percepciones positivas y creencias hacia el laboratorio de prácticas basadas en el marco de trabajo CyberLearning experimental diseñado por los autores. Las experiencias prácticas ayudaron a mejorar su ciudadanía de nativo digital con el fin de satisfacer las futuras capacidades individuales de los alumnos y estilos de aprendizaje, y para fomentar la enseñanza con tecnologías digitales. De igual manera, se abordan algunas recomendaciones y limitaciones.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valentin Ekiaka Nzai, Texas A&M University - Kingsville

Multilingual - Multicultural Assistant Professor
Graduate Coordinator (M.S. in  Bilingual Education)
Preparing Future Faculty Program Director
207 Rhode Hall
Department of  Teacher and Bilingual Education
Texas A&M University - Kingsville


Başer, D., & Yıldırım, Z. (2012). Is technology integration into science: A case of elementary

education. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy (NWSA), 7(2), 840-847.

Bayne, S. & Ross, Y. (2007). The digital native and digital immigrant: a dangerous opposition.

Retrieved on November 15, 2012 from

Collins, A. & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology. The digital

revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College

Corbett, S. (2010). Learning by Playing: Video Games in the Classroom. Retrieved on February

, 2011 from

Dwyer, T., Coonan, W., Leitch, D., Hetzel, B., & Baghurst, R. (1983). An investigation of the

effects of daily physical activity on the health of primary school students in South Australia. International Journal of Epidemiologists, 12(3), 308-313.

Dwyer, T., Sallis, J. F., Blizzard, L., Lazarus, R., & Dean, K. (2001). Relation of academic

performance to physical activity and fitness in children. Pediatric Exercise Science,


Efe, R. (2001). Science student teachers and educational technology: experience, intentions, and

value. Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 228-240.

Ekiaka Nzai, V. & Feng, Y. (2012, in press). The experimental cyberlearning workstations

pedagogical model: tenets and dynamic. Southwest Teaching and Learning Journal (2). Pages to be determined.

Gonzalez, N. Moll, L.C., & Amanti, C.(2005) (Eds). Funds of knowledge. Theorizing practices

in households, communities and classrooms. New York. N.Y: Routledge

Grissom, J. (2005). Physical fitness and academic achievement. Retrieved on October 15,


Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal

study of preservice teachers in a secondary M.A. Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83-106.

Howard, G. (2006). We can’t teach what we don’t know: White teachers, multiracial schools.

nd Edition. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Hussain, M., Niwaz, A., Zaman, A., Dahar, M. A., & Akhtar, M. (2010). Technology based

learning environment and student achievement in English as a foreign language in Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research, 2(5), 398-402.

Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student

learning: Barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 17(6), 560- 565. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9123-5

Kim, K., Jain, S., Westhoff, G., & Rezabek, L. (2008). A quantitative exploration of preservice

teachers’ intent to use computer-based technology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(3), 275-287.

Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and

communities of practice. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 175-


Lalley, J. P. & Miller, R. (2007). The learning pyramid: does it point teachers in the right direction?

Education 128 (1), 64-79

Lavin, A. M., Korte, L., & Davies, T. L. (2010). The impact of classroom technology on student

behavior. Journal Of Technology Research, 2, 65-77.

Linder, K. J. (1999). Sport participation and perceived academic performance of school

children and youth. Pediatric Exercise Science, 11, 129-144.

Linder, K. J. (2002). The physical activity participation-academic performance relationship

revisited: perceived and actual performance and the effect of banding (academic tracking). Pediatric Exercise Science, 14, 155-170.

Mosenson, A. B., & Johnson, J. M. (2008). Instructional strategies and resources: Exploring the

use of technology. Journal of Family Consumer Sciences Education, 26(3), 17-35.

November, A. (2010). Empowering students with technology.2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, Ca:


Palfrey, J. & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital. Understanding the first generation of digital

natives. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books

Park, S., & Ertmer, P. A. (2008). Examining barriers in technology-enhanced problem-based

learning: Using a performance support systems approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 631-643. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00858.x

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. Retrieved May 5, 2011, from


Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives; digital immigrants, Part II. MCB University Press,

Vol. 9 #06

Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives, partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Corwin Press

Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom. Hopeful essays for 21st Century.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin

Reyna, C. (2012). Impact of Cyberreading Workstations on At-Risk Mexican American Elementary

Students’ Vocabulary Acquisition. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation. Kingsville, TX: Texas A&M University-Kingsville

Riessman, C. Kohler. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Sahin, T. Y. (2003). Student teachers’ perceptions of instructional technology: developing

materials based on a constructivist approach. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 34(1), 67-74.

Shephard, R.J (1997). Curricular physical activity and academic performance. Pediatric

Exercise Science, 9:113-125

Skiba, D. J., & Barton, A. J. (2006). Adapting your teaching to accommodate the net generation

of learners. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2), 15.

Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matter for

students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, p.344-355.

Tapscott, D. (2009). Growing up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New

York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.

Tremblay, M. S., Inman, J. W., & Willms, J. D. (2000). The Relationship between physical

activity, self-Esteem, and academic achievement in 12-Year-old children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 12, 312-324

U.S. Department of Education (2010). National education technology plan: transforming

American education, learning powered by technology. Retrieved March12, 2012,

Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics

teachers perspectives. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 20(1), 17-25. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y

Worley, K. (2011). Educating college students of the net generation. Adult Learning, 22(3), 31-

Zur, O. & Zur, A. (2011): On Digital immigrants and digital natives: How the digital divide

affects families, educational institutions, and the workplace. Zur Institute - Online Publication. Retrieved on February 21, 2012 from

How to Cite
Ekiaka Nzai, V., Feng, Y.-L., & Reyna, C. (2014). Preparing Net Gen pre-service teachers for digital native classrooms. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 16(2), 185-200.
Published: 2014-09-22
Research Articles