DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.18312Published:
2022-09-19Issue:
Vol. 24 No. 2 (2022): July-DecemberSection:
Pedagogical InnovationsIncreasing Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention in EFL Young Learners through the Use of Multimodal Texts (Memes)
Aumentando la adquisición y retención del vocabulario en estudiantes de inglés como segunda lengua a través del uso de textos multimodales (memes)
Keywords:
enseñanza de inglés como lengua extranjera, memes, jóvenes estudiantes, vocabulario (es).Keywords:
EFL, memes, young learners, vocabulary (en).Downloads
Abstract (en)
This research assessed the use of multimodal texts for vocabulary acquisition and retention of 18 EFL young learners from 6th grade aged between 11 and 12 years and enrolled in a primary school in Chile. The multimodal texts (memes) were designed by the researchers and selected to meet different criteria in terms of vocabulary. To gather information, three vocabulary tests were administered: before, right after, and two weeks after the end of the intervention. The data from the tests were analyzed with descriptive statistics, while the focus groups were interpreted with the content analysis technique. The results reveal an increase in the acquisition and retention of the selected vocabulary. Furthermore, the focus group conducted with the students shows that young learners value the acquisition of English as a foreign language, especially through the use of vocabulary. Finally, the use of multimodal texts in the classroom is perceived by students as an innovative and fun way to learn.
Abstract (es)
Esta investigación evaluó el uso de textos multimodales para la adquisición y retención de vocabulario de 18 jóvenes estudiantes de inglés como lengua extranjera de entre 11 y 12 años de edad y matriculados en una escuela primaria de Chile. Los textos multimodales (memes) fueron diseñados por los investigadores y seleccionados para cumplir con diferentes criterios en términos de vocabulario. Para recopilar información, se aplicaron tres pruebas de vocabulario: antes, inmediatamente después y dos semanas después del final de la intervención. Los datos de las pruebas se analizaron con estadísticas descriptivas, mientras que los grupos de discusión se interpretaron con la técnica de análisis de contenido. Los resultados revelan un aumento en la adquisición y retención del vocabulario elegido. Además, el grupo focal realizado con los alumnos muestra que los estudiantes jóvenes valoran la adquisición del inglés como lengua extranjera, especialmente a través del uso de vocabulario. Por último, el uso de textos multimodales en el aula es percibido por los alumnos como una forma innovadora y divertida de aprender.
References
Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., & Adams, A. M. (2004). A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.002
Anstey, M., & Bull, G. (2006). Teaching and learning multiliteracies: Changing times, changing literacies. International Reading Association.
Arikan, A., & Taraf, H. U. (2010). Contextualizing young learners’ English lessons with cartoons: Focus on grammar and vocabulary. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5212-5215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.848
Bagnoli, A., & Clark, A. (2010). Focus groups with young people: A participatory approach to research planning. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(1), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903173504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260903173504
Bailey, K. M., & Curtis, A. (2015). Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions, and directions (2nd ed.). National Geographic Learning.
Barahona, M. (2016). Challenges and accomplishments of ELT at primary level in Chile: Towards the aspiration of becoming a bilingual country. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(82), 2248. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2448
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.2307/1317652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1317652
Berk, L. E. (2005). Infants, children and adolescents (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon Inc.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, J. D., & Trace, J. (2017). Fifteen ways to improve classroom assessment. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (vol. 3, pp. 490-505). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716893-35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716893-35
Cameron, L. (2003). Challenges for ELT from the expansion in teaching children. ELT Journal, 57(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.2.105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.2.105
Christensen, P., & Prout, A. (2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood, 9(4), 477-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009004007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568202009004007
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2017). The journey to children's mindsets –and beyond. Child Development Perspectives, 11(2), 139-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12225
Gallacher, L.-A., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. Childhood, 15(4), 499-516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091672
García, M. A., & Mardones, M. (2012). Análisis de la correlación entre los programas de estudio para la enseñanza del inglés en educación general básica en Chile y la teoría del desarrollo intelectual de Piaget. Revista Electrónica Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 12(3), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v12i3.10292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v12i3.10292
Glas, K. (2008). El inglés abre puertas... ¿a qué? Análisis del discurso sobre la enseñanza del inglés en Chile, 2003-2006. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 20(51), 11-122. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/revistaeyp/article/view/9900
Harmon, J. M., Wood, K. D., & Keser, K. (2009). Promoting vocabulary learning with interactive word wall. Middle School Journal, 40(3), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2009.11495588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2009.11495588
Hartshorne, J., Tenenbaum, J., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007
Inostroza, M. J. (2018). Chilean young learners’ perspectives on their EFL lesson in primary schools. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 18(1), 133-163. https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v18i1.31323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v18i1.31323
Karadeniz Kayali, N., & Altuntaş, A. (2021). Using memes in the language classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3908
Karpicke, J. D. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: Active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412443552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412443552
Khasinah, S. (2014). Factors influencing second language acquisition. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 1(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v1i2.187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v1i2.187
Krashen, S. (1994). The input hypothesis and its rivals. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and Explicit Learning of Language (pp. 45-77). Academic Press.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.
Laufer, B. (2003). Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: Do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 565-585. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.567
Liu, Y. (2016). Exploring the feasibility of applying memetics in teaching English as second language. In L. Jian & M. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 4th International Education, Economics, Social Science, Arts, Sports and Management Engineering Conference (IEESASM 2016) (85-90). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ieesasm-16.2016.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ieesasm-16.2016.19
Loftus, G., & Loftus, E. (1976). Human memory: The processing of information. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McAteer, M. (2013). Action research in education. Sage Publications Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913967
McCarthy, M., O’Keeffe, A., & Walsh, S. (2010). Vocabulary matrix: Understanding, learning, teaching. CENGAGE Learning.
Ministerio de Educación (2012). Bases curriculares 2012. Idioma extranjero inglés. Ministerio de Educación, Gobierno de Chile.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
Nation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 136-145. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/323110104.pdf
Nation, P., & Gu, P. Y. (2007). Focus on vocabulary. National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
Neuman, S. B., & Dwyer, J. (2009). Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in pre-k. The Reading Teacher, 62(5), 384-392. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.5.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.5.2
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nunan, D. (2011). Teaching English to young learners (1st ed.). Anaheim University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0715
OECD (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en
Ozfidan, B., & Burlbaw, L. M. (2019). A literature-based approach on age factors in second language acquisition: Children, Adolescents, and Adults. International Education Studies, 12(10), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p27
Paivio, A. (2006). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (vol. 2, pp. 697-698). Sage.
Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18, 1-28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ759833.pdf
Pinter, A. (2014). Child participant roles in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt008
Pinter, A., & Zandian, S. (2014). ‘I don’t ever want to leave this room’: Benefits of researching ‘with’ children. ELT Journal, 68(1), 64-74 https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct057
Richards, C. J., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Pearson Education.
Romero, E. & Bobkina, J. (2017). Teaching visual literacy through memes in the language classroom. In K. Donaghy & D. Xerri (Eds.), The Image in English Language Teaching (p. 59-70). ELT Council.
Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual. An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. Teachers College Press.
Shen, W. (2003). Current trends of vocabulary teaching and learning strategies for EFL setting. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7, 187-224. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Current-Trends-of-Vocabulary-Teaching-and-Learning-Shen/01c205b5bbab59ceed36ae5d1888aa5000daae2f
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Cognition in Education (vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Thornbury, S. (2004). How to teach vocabulary (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
Metrics
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pablo Aedo, Claudia Millafilo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
The journal allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Also, The Colombian Apllied Linguistics Journal will allow the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.