DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.18586Publicado:
09/30/2021Número:
Vol. 42 Núm. 3 (2021): Septiembre-Diciembre 2021Sección:
Educación CientíficaTecnologías de energías renovables (TER) desde el compromiso público
Renewable Energy Technologies (RET) from Public Engagement
Palabras clave:
education, public engagement, renewable energies, technologies (en).Palabras clave:
compromiso público, educación, energías renovables, tecnologías (es).Descargas
Referencias
Alsina, V., Martí, J. L. (2018). The birth of the crowd law movement: Tech-based citizen participation, legitimacy, and the quality of lawmaking. Analyse & Kritik, 40(2), 337-358. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2018-0019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2018-0019
Ballesteros-Ballesteros, V. A., Gallego-Torres, A. P. (2019). Model of education in renewable energies from the public engagement and the energetic attitude. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 28(52), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v28.n52.2019.9652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v28.n52.2019.9652
Batel, S. (2020). Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: Past, present and future. Energy Research & Social Science, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101544
Bauwens, T., Devine-Wright, P. (2018). Positive energies? An empirical study of community energy participation and attitudes to renewable energy. Energy Policy, 118, 612-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.062
Berg, M., Lidskog, R. (2018). Deliberative democracy meets democratized science: A deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919
Bertsch, V., Hall, M., Weinhardt, C., Fichtner, W. (2016). Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany. Energy, 114, 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.022
Bidwell, D. (2016a). The effects of information on public attitudes toward renewable energy. Environment and Behavior, 48(6), 743-768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514554696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514554696
Bidwell, D. (2016b). Thinking through participation in renewable energy decisions. Nature Energy, 1, e16051. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.51
Brown, M. T., Ulgiati, S. (1999). Emerge evaluation of the biosphere and natural capital. AMBIO A Journal of the Human Environment, 28(6), 1-15
Burningham, K., Barnett, J., Walker, G. (2015). An array of deficits: Unpacking NIMBY discourses in wind energy developers’ conceptualizations of their local opponents. Society & Natural Resources, 28(3), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.933923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.933923
Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. (2018). Being a “citizen” in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84, 1-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8
Cass, N., Walker, G. (2009). Emotion and rationality: The characterization and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(1), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2009.05.006
Cass, N., Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P. (2010). Good neighbors, public relations, and bribes: the politics and perceptions of community benefit provision in renewable energy development in the UK. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(3), 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2010.509558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2010.509558
Devine-Wright, P., Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.008
Dinica, V. (2018). Public engagement in governance for sustainability: A two-tier assessment approach and illustrations from New Zealand. Public Management Review, 20(1), 23-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1293142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1293142
Firestone, J., Kempton, W. (2007). Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1584-1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010
Franco Moreno, R. A., Reina Hernández, J. A., Riveros Toro, C. M. (2020). Concepciones sobre química verde en profesores de química en formación inicial. Noria: Investigación Educativa, 1(5), 94-108
Furlan, C., Mortarino, C. (2018). Forecasting the impact of renewable energies in competition with non-renewable sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1879-1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.284
Futrell, R. (2003). Framing processes, cognitive liberation, and NIMBY protest in the US chemical‐weapons disposal conflict. Sociological Inquiry, 73(3), 359-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682X.00061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682X.00061
Gustafsson, S., Ivner, J., Palm, J. (2015). Management and stakeholder participation in local strategic energy planning: Examples from Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.014
Hsieh, T., Vaickus, M. H., Remick, D. G. (2018). Enhancing scientific foundations to ensure reproducibility: A new paradigm. The American Journal of Pathology, 188(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.08.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.08.028
James, J. (2019). Strength benefit of sawdust/wood ash amendment in cement stabilization of an expansive soil. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 28(50), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v28.n50.2019.8790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v28.n50.2019.8790
Kandpal, T. C., Broman, L. (2014) Renewable Energy Education: A Global Status Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 300-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.039
Kreimer, P., Vessuri, H. (2018). Latin American science, technology, and society: A historical and reflexive approach. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622
Kropp, C. (2018). Controversies around energy landscapes in third modernity. Landscape Research, 43(4), 562-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1287890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1287890
Larson, E., Krannich, R. (2016). “A great idea, just not near me!” Understanding public attitudes about renewable energy facilities. Society & Natural Resources, 29(12), 1436-1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1150536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1150536
Li, G., Zheng, X. (2016). Thermal energy storage system integration forms for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 736-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.076
Lilliestam, J., Hanger, S. (2016). Shades of green: Centralization, decentralization, and controversy among European renewable electricity visions. Energy Research & Social Science, 17, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.011
Lyall, C., Tait, J. (2017). New Modes of Governance: Developing an Integrated Policy Approach to Science, Technology, Risk, and the Environment. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315248042
MacFarlane, J. M. (2018). Managing the future imaginary: Does ‘post-normal’ science need public relations? RT: A Journal on Research Policy and Evaluation, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.13130/2282-5398/9139
Martin, V. Y. (2017). Citizen science as a means for increasing public engagement in science: Presumption or possibility? Science Communication, 39(2), 142-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017696165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017696165
Mor, N., Reich, Z. (2018). From “Trust Me” to “Show Me” Journalism: Can DocumentCloud help to restore the deteriorating credibility of news? Journalism Practice, 12(9), 1091-1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1376593 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1376593
Neshkova, M. I., Guo, H. (2018). Policy target populations and public participation in agency decision making. International Public Management Journal, 21(2), 297-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1160012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1160012
Ntanos, S., Kyriakopoulos, G., Chalikias, M., Arabatzis, G., Skordoulis, M. (2018). Public perceptions and willingness to pay for renewable energy: A case study from Greece. Sustainability, 10(3), e687. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030687
Ortega-Quevedo, V., Gil Puente, C. (2019). La naturaleza de la ciencia y la tecnología: una experiencia para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico. Científica, 35(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.14095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.14095
Petrova, M. A. (2016). From NIMBY to acceptance: Toward a novel framework VESPA for organizing and interpreting community concerns. Renewable Energy, 86, 1280-1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.047
Rees, W., Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4-6), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4
Rip, A. (2018). Science institutions and grand challenges of society: A scenario. In Futures of Science and Technology in Society (pp. 35-47). Springer DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21754-9_3
Robayo-Salazar, R. A., Mejía de Gutiérrez, R., Mulford-Carvajal, A. J. (2016). Production of building elements based on alkali-activated red clay brick waste. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 25(43), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v25.n43.2016.5294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v25.n43.2016.5294
Salamanca-Céspedes, J. E. (2019). La educación en energías renovables no convencionales en la formación de ingenieros electrónicos. Noria: Investigación Educativa, 2(4), 11-18.
Schot, J., Rip, A. (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
Speer, P. W., Han, H. (2018). Re-engaging social relationships and collective dimensions of organizing to revive democratic practice. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(2), 745-758. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i2.929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i2.929
Toke, D., Breukers, S., Wolsink, M. (2008). Wind power deployment outcomes: How can we account for the differences? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(4), 1129-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.10.021
Toynbee, P. (2007). Nimbys can't be allowed to put a block on wind farms. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/jan/05/comment.politics
Walker, G. (1995). Renewable energy and the public. Land Use Policy, 12(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(95)90074-C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(95)90074-C
Walker, G., Cass, N. (2007). Carbon reduction, “the public” and renewable energy: engaging with socio‐technical configurations. Area, 39(4), 458-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00772.x
Walker, G., Cass, N., Burningham, K., Barnett, J. (2010). Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of ‘the public’ and their implications. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(4), 931-947. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a41400
Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Cass, N., Devine-Wright, H., Speller, G., Barton, J. P., Evans, B., Heath, Y., Infield, D., Parks, J., Theobald, K. (2014). Symmetries, expectations, dynamics and contexts: A framework for understanding public engagement with renewable energy projects. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation (pp.33-46). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776707
Wilsdon, J., Willis, R. (2004). See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream (1st ed.). Demos (London). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3844.3681
Wilsdon, J., Wynne, B., Stilgoe, J. (2005). The Public Value of Science (or How to Ensure that Science Really Matters) (1st ed.). Demos (London). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2281.7449
Wolsink, M. (2000). Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy, 21(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00130-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00130-5
Wolsink, M. (2007a). Planning of renewables schemes: Deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2692-2704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.002
Wolsink, M. (2007b). Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(6), 1188-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683-2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
El (los) autor(es) al enviar su artículo a la Revista Científica certifica que su manuscrito no ha sido, ni será presentado ni publicado en ninguna otra revista científica.
Dentro de las políticas editoriales establecidas para la Revista Científica en ninguna etapa del proceso editorial se establecen costos, el envío de artículos, la edición, publicación y posterior descarga de los contenidos es de manera gratuita dado que la revista es una publicación académica sin ánimo de lucro.
