Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto

Centroid of an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set: Continuous vs. Discrete

Authors

  • Omar Salazar Morales Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
  • José Humberto Serrano Devia Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
  • José Jairo Soriano Mendez Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Keywords:

Centroide, Algoritmo Karnik-Mendel, Algoritmo recursivo, conjunto difuso tipo-2 de intervalo. (es).

Keywords:

Centroid, Karnik-Mendel algorithm, interval type-2 fuzzy set, recursive algorithm. (en).

Abstract (es)

El algoritmo de Karnik-Mendel presenta siempre dos procedimientos independientes para calcular el centroide de un conjunto difuso tipo-2 de intervalo: el primero calculando su extremo izquierdo (denotado como c l ) y el segundo calculando su extremo derecho (denotado como c r ). Esto a´un es cierto en diferentes versiones del algoritmo que han sido propuestas en la literatura. En la versión discreta del centroide no hay problemas relacionados con la convergencia dado que existe un número finito de términos para sumar. Por otro lado, la versión continua tiene algunos problemas relacionados con la convergencia. Este artículo presenta una discusión simple donde se muestra que el cálculo de c l y c r en su versión discreta es el mismo problema y no dos problemas diferentes. También se muestran algunos problemas relacionados con la convergencia del centroide en su versión continua.

Abstract (en)

Karnik-Mendel algorithm involves execution of two independent procedures for computing the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set: the first one for computing the left endpoint of the interval centroid (which is denoted by c l ), and the second one for computing its right counterpart (which is denoted by c r ). Convergence of the discrete version of the algorithm to compute the centroid is known, whereas convergence of the continuous version may exhibit some issues. This paper shows that the calculation of c l and c r are really the same problem on the discrete version, and also we describe some problems related with the convergence of the centroid on its continuous version.

Author Biographies

Omar Salazar Morales, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Electronics engineer, Universidad Distrital “Francisco Jose de Caldas”, Bogota, Colombia. At present, he works with the Laboratory for Automation and Computational Intelligence LAMIC in the development of fuzzy models applied to automatic control. His interests are non-linear control, fuzzy systems and mathematics.

José Humberto Serrano Devia, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Mathematician, Universidad Pedagogica Nacional, Bogota, Colombia, and Master of science in mathematics of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia. At present, he works as titular professor in the engineering department of the Universidad Distrital. His interests are functional analysis, Fourier analysis and complex variable.

José Jairo Soriano Mendez, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Electronics engineer, Universidad Distrital “Francisco Jose de Caldas”, Bogota, Colombia, and Master of science in Industrial Engineering of the Universidad Distrital. At present, he works with the Laboratory for Automation and Computational Intelligence LAMIC in the development of fuzzy models applied to automatic control, and titular professor in the engineering department of the Universidad Distrital. His interests are fuzzy systems, automatic control and mathematics.

References

N. N. Karnik and J. M. Mendel, “Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy s et,” Information Sciences, vol. 132, pp. 195–220, 2001.

J. M. Mendel and F. Liu, “Super-exponential convergence of the Karnik-Mendel algorithms for computing the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 309–320, April 2007.

J. M. Mendel, “On centroid calculations for type-2 fuzzy sets,” Appl. Comput. Math., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 88–96, 2011.

H. Bernal, K. Duran, and M. Melgarejo, “A comparative stud y between two algorithms for computing the generalized centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ 2008), 2008, pp. 954–959.

M. Melgarejo, “A fast recursive method to compute the gener alized centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set,” in Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society NAFIPS 2007, San Diego, California, USA, June 2007, pp. 190–194.

L. K. Durán and M. A. Melgarejo, “Implementación hardware del algoritmo Karnik-Mendel mejorado basada en operadores CORDIC,” Ingeniería y Competitividad, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 21–39, 2009.

J. M. Mendel and H. Wu, “Uncertainty bounds and their use i n the design of interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 622–639, 2002.

J. M. Mendel and R. I. John, “Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 117–127, 2002.

J. M. Mendel and H. Wu, “New results about the centroid of a n interval type-2 fuzzy set, including the centroid of a fuzzy granule,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, pp. 360–377, 2007.

O. Salazar, J. Soriano, and H. Serrano, “A short note on t he centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set,” in Proceedings of 2012 Workshop on Engineering Applications (WEA), Bogotá, Colombia, May 2011.

How to Cite

APA

Salazar Morales, O., Serrano Devia, J. H., and Soriano Mendez, J. J. (2011). Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto. Ingeniería, 16(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.3834

ACM

[1]
Salazar Morales, O. et al. 2011. Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto. Ingeniería. 16, 2 (Dec. 2011), 67–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.3834.

ACS

(1)
Salazar Morales, O.; Serrano Devia, J. H.; Soriano Mendez, J. J. Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto. Ing. 2011, 16, 67-78.

ABNT

SALAZAR MORALES, Omar; SERRANO DEVIA, José Humberto; SORIANO MENDEZ, José Jairo. Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto. Ingeniería, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 67–78, 2011. DOI: 10.14483/23448393.3834. Disponível em: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/3834. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2024.

Chicago

Salazar Morales, Omar, José Humberto Serrano Devia, and José Jairo Soriano Mendez. 2011. “Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto”. Ingeniería 16 (2):67-78. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.3834.

Harvard

Salazar Morales, O., Serrano Devia, J. H. and Soriano Mendez, J. J. (2011) “Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto”, Ingeniería, 16(2), pp. 67–78. doi: 10.14483/23448393.3834.

IEEE

[1]
O. Salazar Morales, J. H. Serrano Devia, and J. J. Soriano Mendez, “Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto”, Ing., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 67–78, Dec. 2011.

MLA

Salazar Morales, Omar, et al. “Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto”. Ingeniería, vol. 16, no. 2, Dec. 2011, pp. 67-78, doi:10.14483/23448393.3834.

Turabian

Salazar Morales, Omar, José Humberto Serrano Devia, and José Jairo Soriano Mendez. “Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto”. Ingeniería 16, no. 2 (December 18, 2011): 67–78. Accessed November 28, 2024. https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/3834.

Vancouver

1.
Salazar Morales O, Serrano Devia JH, Soriano Mendez JJ. Centroide de un Conjunto Difuso Tipo-2 de Intervalo: Continuo vs. Discreto. Ing. [Internet]. 2011 Dec. 18 [cited 2024 Nov. 28];16(2):67-78. Available from: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/3834

Download Citation

Visitas

451

Dimensions


PlumX


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
76%
33%
Days to publication 
366
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Loading...