DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.23090

Published:

2026-04-08

Issue:

Vol. 31 No. 1 (2026)

Section:

Electrical, Electronic and Telecommunications Engineering

Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study

Evaluación de la eficacia de los algoritmos de optimización, P&O y MPC en MPPT para sistemas fotovoltaicos: Un estudio comparativo

Authors

Keywords:

Solar power system, Partial Shading, Power converter, DC/DC converters, Boost converter, maximum power point tracking, MPPT, MPC, model predictive control, Optimization algorithms, Energy effiency (en).

Keywords:

Sistemas de Energía solar, Sombreado parcial, Convertidores de potencia, convertidores DC/DC, convertidor Boost, Seguimiento de punto de máxima potencia, MPPT, MPC, Control Predictivo Basado En Modelo, Algoritmos de optimización, Eficiencia Energetica (es).

Abstract (en)

Context: The need for efficient energy harvesting in photovoltaic (PV) systems requires advanced maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques. Traditional methods like perturb and observe (P&O) exhibit limitations under varying conditions, leading to less efficient energy extraction.

Method: This study compares a model-predictive controller (MPC) combined with optimization algorithms such as the particle swarm optimizer (PSO), the vortex search algorithm (VSA), and the salp swarm algorithm (SSA) to improve MPPT performance in PV systems. These algorithms are tested under different irradiance conditions to assess their efficiency and adaptability.

Results: The results show that PSO, when used with MPC, greatly enhances energy extraction compared to the conventional P&O method. Additionally, VSA and SSA also perform well in adapting to rapid irradiance changes, ensuring an optimal power output.

Conclusions: Optimization-based MPPT methods, especially those using PSO, offer significant efficiency improvements for PV systems, making them strong alternatives to traditional techniques.

Abstract (es)

Contexto: La creciente demanda de extracción eficiente de energía en sistemas fotovoltaicos (PV) requiere técnicas avanzadas de seguimiento del punto de máxima potencia (MPPT). Métodos tradicionales como perturb and observe (P&O) enfrentan limitaciones bajo condiciones ambientales variables, conlleva una extracción subóptima de energía.

Método: Este estudio presenta un análisis comparativo de un controlador predictivo de modelos (MPC) integrado con varios algoritmos de optimización, incluyendo la Optimización por Enjambre de Partículas (PSO), el Algoritmo de Búsqueda de Vórtices (VSA) y el Algoritmo de Enjambre de Salpas (SSA), para mejorar el rendimiento del MPPT en sistemas PV. Los algoritmos fueron evaluados bajo diferentes perfiles de irradiancia para determinar su eficiencia y adaptabilidad.

Resultados: Los resultados indican que PSO, cuando se combina con MPC, mejora significativamente la eficiencia de extracción de energía en comparación con el método convencional P&O. Además, VSA y SSA también demuestran un rendimiento superior al adaptarse a cambios rápidos en la irradiancia, asegurando una salida de potencia optima.

Conclusiones: Los métodos MPPT basados en optimización, particularmente aquellos que utilizan PSO, ofrecen mejoras sustanciales en la eficiencia de los sistemas PV, lo que los posiciona como alternativas viables a las técnicas MPPT tradicionales.

References

[1] T. Ahmad and D. Zhang, "A critical review of comparative global historical energy consumption and future demand: the story told so far," Energy Rep., vol. 6, pp. 1973-1991, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.020

[2] K. Makieła, B. Mazur, and J. Głowacki, "The impact of renewable energy supply on economic growth and productivity," Energies, vol. 15, no. 13, p. 4808, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134808

[3] Y. Zhu and C. Huo, "The impact of agricultural production efficiency on agricultural carbon emissions in china," Energies, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 4464, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124464

[4] M. Khezri, M. S. Karimi, J. Mamkhezri, R. Ghazal, and L. Blank, "Assessing the impact of selected determinants on renewable energy sources in the electricity mix: the case of ASEAN countries," Energies, vol. 15, no. 13, p. 4604, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134604

[5] P. Zhang and D. Hao, "Enterprise financial management and fossil fuel energy efficiency for green economic growth," Resour. Policy, vol. 84, p. 103763, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103763

[6] C. Tudor and R. Sova, "On the impact of GDP per capita, carbon intensity and innovation for renewable energy consumption: worldwide evidence," Energies, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 6254, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196254

[7] A. Bughneda, M. Salem, A. Richelli, D. Ishak, and S. Alatai, "Review of multilevel inverters for PV energy system applications," Energies, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 1585, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061585

[8] I. Jagadeesh and V. Indragandhi, "Comparative study of DC-DC converters for solar PV with microgrid applications," Energies, vol. 15, no. 20, p. 7569, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207569

[9] M.-H. Hwang, Y.-G. Kim, H.-S. Lee, Y.-D. Kim, and H.-R. Cha, "A study on the improvement of efficiency by detection solar module faults in deteriorated photovoltaic power plants," Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 727, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020727

[10] S. A. Gorji, H. G. Sahebi, M. Ektesabi, and A. B. Rad, "Topologies and control schemes of bidirectional DC-DC power converters: an overview," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 117 997-118 019, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2937239

[11] L. Zhang, Z. Wang, S. Li, S. Ding, and H. Du, "Universal finite-time observer based second-order sliding mode control for DC-DC buck converters with only output voltage measurement," J. Franklin Inst., vol. 357, no. 16, pp. 11 863-11 879, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.11.057

[12] M. Mao, L. Cui, Q. Zhang, K. Guo, L. Zhou, and H. Huang, "Classification and summarization of solar photovoltaic MPPT techniques: a review based on traditional and intelligent control strategies," Energy Rep., vol. 6, pp. 1312-1327, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.05.013

[13] R. B. Bollipo, S. Mikkili, and P. K. Bonthagorla, "Hybrid, optimal, intelligent and classical PV MPPT techniques: a review," CSEE J. Power Energy Syst., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9-33, 2020.

[14] S. Bhattacharyya, D. S. P. Kumar, S. Samanta, and S. Mishra, "Steady output and fast tracking MPPT (SOFT-MPPT) for P&O and InC algorithms," IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 293-302, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2020.2991768

[15] P. Kumar and I. Srikanth, "Power quality performance enhancement by PV-based distribution static compensator under incremental conductance maximum power point tracking algorithm," Cleaner Energy Syst., vol. 4, p. 100062, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cles.2023.100062

[16] F. J. Diez, A. Martínez-Rodríguez, L. M. Navas-Gracia, L. Chico-Santamarta, A. Correa-Guimaraes, and R. Andara, "Estimation of the hourly global solar irradiation on the tilted and oriented plane of photovoltaic solar panels applied to greenhouse production," Agronomy, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 495, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030495

[17] J. A. Qahouq, Y. Jiang, and W. Huang, "Load-voltage-based single-sensor MPPT controller for multi-channel PV systems," in Proc. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo. (APEC), 2014, pp. 3451-3454. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2014.6803804

[18] A. Ortiz, E. Mendez, I. Macias, and A. Molina, "Earthquake algorithm-based voltage referenced MPPT implementation through a standardized validation frame," Energies, vol. 15, no. 23, p. 8971, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238971

[19] M. Jiang, M. Ghahremani, S. Dadfar, H. Chi, Y. N. Abdallah, and N. Furukawa, "A novel combinatorial hybrid SFL-PS algorithm based neural network with perturb and observe for the MPPT controller of a hybrid PV-storage system," Control Eng. Pract., vol. 114, p. 104880, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104880

[20] S. Hadji, J.-P. Gaubert, and F. Krim, "Real-time genetic algorithms-based MPPT: study and comparison (theoretical and experimental) with conventional methods," Energies, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 459, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11020459

[21] M. H. Zafar, N. M. Khan, A. F. Mirza, and M. Mansoor, "Bio-inspired optimization algorithms based maximum power point tracking technique for photovoltaic systems under partial shading and complex partial shading conditions," J. Cleaner Prod., vol. 309, p. 127279, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127279

[22] R. Mas, A. Berastain, A. Antoniou, L. Angeles, S. Valencia, and C. Celis, "Genetic algorithms-based size optimization of directly and indirectly coupled photovoltaic-electrolyzer systems," Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 270, p. 116213, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116213

[23] A. G. Abo-Khalil, I. I. El-Sharkawy, A. Radwan, and S. Memon, "Influence of a hybrid MPPT technique, SA-P&O, on PV system performance under partial shading conditions," Energies, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 577, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020577

[24] M. A. Hafeez, A. Naeem, M. Akram, M. Y. Javed, A. B. Asghar, and Y. Wang, "A novel hybrid MPPT technique based on harris hawk optimization (HHO) and perturb and observer (P&O) under partial and complex partial shading conditions," Energies, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 5550, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155550

[25] M. Rastogi, A. Ahmad, and A. H. Bhat, "Performance investigation of two-level reduced-switch D- STATCOM in grid-tied solar-PV array with stepped P&O MPPT algorithm and modified SRF strategy," J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci., vol. 35, no. 6, p. 393-405, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.06.008

[26] K. Ali, L. Khan, Q. Khan, S. Ullah, S. Ahmad, S. Mumtaz, F. W. Karam, and Naghmash, "Robust integral backstepping based nonlinear MPPT control for a PV system," Energies, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 3180, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12163180

[27] S. Mo, Q. Ye, K. Jiang, X. Mo, and G. Shen, "An improved MPPT method for photovoltaic systems based on mayfly optimization algorithm," Energy Rep., vol. 8, pp. 141-150, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.160

[28] T. Hai, J. Zhou, and K. Muranaka, "An efficient fuzzy-logic based MPPT controller for grid-connected PV systems by farmland fertility optimization algorithm," Optik, vol. 267, p. 169636, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169636

[29] B. C. Phan, Y.-C. Lai, and C. E. Lin, "A deep reinforcement learning-based MPPT control for PV systems under partial shading condition," Sensors, vol. 20, no. 11, p. 3039, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113039

[30] M. L. Katche, A. B. Makokha, S. O. Zachary, and M. S. Adaramola, "A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques used in solar PV systems," Energies, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 2206, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052206

[31] A. Almutairi, A. G. Abo-Khalil, K. Sayed, and N. Albagami, "MPPT for a PV grid-connected system to improve efficiency under partial shading conditions," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 24, p. 10310, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410310

[32] S. Angadi, U. R. Yaragatti, Y. Suresh, and A. B. Raju, "System parameter based performance optimization of solar PV systems with perturbation based MPPT algorithms," Energies, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 2007, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14072007

[33] A. Gündo˘gdu, "System identification based ARV-MPPT technique for PV systems under variable atmospheric conditions," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 51 325-51 342, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3174107

[34] L. Tightiz, S. Mansouri, F. Zishan, J. Yoo, and N. Shafaghatian, "Maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems operating under partially shaded conditions using SALP swarm algorithm," Energies, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 8210, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218210

[35] Z.-K. Fan, A. Setianingrum, K.-L. Lian, and S. Suwarno, "A hybrid approach for photovoltaic maximum power tracking under partial shading using honey badger and genetic algorithms," Energies, vol. 17, no. 16, p. 3935, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17163935

[36] L. A. T. Grisales, C. A. Ramos-Paja, and A. J. Saavedra-Montes, "Techniques for modeling photovoltaic systems under partial shading," Tecnura, vol. 20, no. 48, pp. 171-183, 2016.

[37] A. Gómez and R. Correa, "Implementación de un sistema de control predictivo multivariable en un horno," Dyna, vol. 76, no. 157, pp. 195-203, 2009.

[38] MathWorks, "Model predictive control toolbox," 2023, https://la.mathworks.com/products/model-predictive-control.html (accessed Jun. 21, 2023). [Online]. Available: https://la.mathworks.com/products/model-predictive-control.html

[39] J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, "Particle swarm optimization," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Netw.(ICNN), vol. 4, 1995, pp. 1942-1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968

[40] B. Do˘gan and T. Ölmez, "A new metaheuristic for numerical function optimization: vortex search algorithm," Inf. Sci., vol. 293, pp. 125-145, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.08.053

[41] J. Montano, A. F. T. Mejia, A. A. R. Muñoz, F. Andrade, O. D. G. Rivera, and J. M. Palomeque, "Salp swarm optimization algorithm for estimating the parameters of photovoltaic panels based on the three-diode model," Electronics, vol. 10, no. 24, p. 3123, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10243123

[42] S. S. Dragomir, P. Cerone, and A. Sofo, "Some remarks on the trapezoid rule in numerical integration," RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect., vol. 2, no. 5, 1999.

How to Cite

APA

Mena-Palomeque, J., Zabala Daza, J. E., Gomez Pemberty, J. A., and Ramirez Ospina, J. A. (2026). Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study. Ingeniería, 31(1), e23090. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.23090

ACM

[1]
Mena-Palomeque, J. et al. 2026. Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study. Ingeniería. 31, 1 (Apr. 2026), e23090. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.23090.

ACS

(1)
Mena-Palomeque, J.; Zabala Daza, J. E.; Gomez Pemberty, J. A.; Ramirez Ospina, J. A. Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study. Ing. 2026, 31, e23090.

ABNT

MENA-PALOMEQUE, Jose; ZABALA DAZA, Juan Esteban; GOMEZ PEMBERTY, Jhon Anderson; RAMIREZ OSPINA, Jaime Alberto. Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study. Ingeniería, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. e23090, 2026. DOI: 10.14483/23448393.23090. Disponível em: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/23090. Acesso em: 13 apr. 2026.

Chicago

Mena-Palomeque, Jose, Juan Esteban Zabala Daza, Jhon Anderson Gomez Pemberty, and Jaime Alberto Ramirez Ospina. 2026. “Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study”. Ingeniería 31 (1):e23090. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.23090.

Harvard

Mena-Palomeque, J. (2026) “Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study”, Ingeniería, 31(1), p. e23090. doi: 10.14483/23448393.23090.

IEEE

[1]
J. Mena-Palomeque, J. E. Zabala Daza, J. A. Gomez Pemberty, and J. A. Ramirez Ospina, “Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study”, Ing., vol. 31, no. 1, p. e23090, Apr. 2026.

MLA

Mena-Palomeque, Jose, et al. “Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study”. Ingeniería, vol. 31, no. 1, Apr. 2026, p. e23090, doi:10.14483/23448393.23090.

Turabian

Mena-Palomeque, Jose, Juan Esteban Zabala Daza, Jhon Anderson Gomez Pemberty, and Jaime Alberto Ramirez Ospina. “Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study”. Ingeniería 31, no. 1 (April 8, 2026): e23090. Accessed April 13, 2026. https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/23090.

Vancouver

1.
Mena-Palomeque J, Zabala Daza JE, Gomez Pemberty JA, Ramirez Ospina JA. Assessing the Efficacy of optimization algorithms, P&O and MPC in MPPT for Photovoltaic Systems: A Comparative Study. Ing. [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 8 [cited 2026 Apr. 13];31(1):e23090. Available from: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/23090

Download Citation

Visitas

0

Dimensions


PlumX


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
78%
33%
Days to publication 
482
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Loading...