DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.22514

Published:

2026-05-19

Issue:

Vol. 31 No. 1 (2026): January-April

Section:

Electrical, Electronic and Telecommunications Engineering

Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems

Análisis comparativo de las normas ANSI/IEEE C.37 y 141 e IEC 60909 para el cálculo de cortocircuitos en sistemas industriales

Authors

  • John Muñoz Goez Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo image/svg+xml
  • Joseph Camilo Sosapanta Salas Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo image/svg+xml
  • Jhon Noguera-Jiménez Unidad Central del Valle del Cauca image/svg+xml

Keywords:

electrical system modeling, electrical transient analyzer program , load flows, protection coordination (en).

Keywords:

modelado de sistemas eléctricos, programa de analizador de transitorios eléctricos , flujos de carga, coordinación de protecciones (es).

Abstract (en)

Context: Calculating short-circuit currents is key to equipment sizing and protection coordination in electrical power systems. However, methodological differences between ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 create uncertainty when selecting the most appropriate approach. This study addresses this problem through a comparative analysis based on computer simulations that evaluate both methodologies under equivalent conditions.

Method: An industrial system with 44 busbars is modeled in ETAP (version 20.0), considering grid connection, local generation, and rotating loads. Short-circuit currents are calculated while following the procedures of both standards, and five representative fault points are analyzed. The evaluation includes six parameters: symmetrical inrush current, half-cycle closing current, peak fault current, interrupting current, asymmetrical breaking current, and steady-state current.

Results: The IEC method yields values ​​between 5 and 10% higher than those obtained with ANSI/IEEE in most cases. The greatest differences are observed at busbars near generators and higher-power rotating machines, reaching up to 9.34% in the inrush current. These variations are mainly associated with the treatment of the X/R ratio and the voltage factor c applied in IEC.

Conclusions: The IEC 60909 standard offers more conservative estimates for demanding designs, while ANSI/IEEE is useful in preliminary analyses, providing practical criteria for selecting the standard based on system criticality.

Abstract (es)

Contexto: El cálculo de corrientes de cortocircuito es clave para el dimensionamiento de equipos y la coordinación de protecciones en sistemas eléctricos de potencia. Sin embargo, las diferencias metodológicas entre las normas ANSI/IEEE C.37 y 141 e IEC 60909 generan incertidumbre al seleccionar el enfoque más adecuado. Este estudio aborda esta problemática mediante un análisis comparativo basado en simulaciones computacionales que evalúan ambas metodologías bajo condiciones equivalentes.

Método: Se modela un sistema industrial de 44 barras en ETAP (versión 20.0), considerando conexión a la red eléctrica, generación local y cargas rotativas. Las corrientes de cortocircuito se calculan siguiendo los procedimientos de ambas normas y se analizan cinco puntos de falla representativos. La evaluación incluye seis parámetros: corriente inicial simétrica, corriente de cierre de medio ciclo, corriente pico de falla, corriente de interrupción, corriente de ruptura asimétrica y corriente en estado estable.

Resultados: El método IEC presenta valores entre un 5 y un 10% superiores a los obtenidos con ANSI/IEEE en la mayoría de los casos. Las mayores diferencias se observan en barras cercanas a generadores y máquinas rotativas de mayor potencia, alcanzando hasta un 9.34 % en la corriente de cierre. Estas variaciones se asocian principalmente con el tratamiento de la relación X/R y el factor de voltaje c aplicado en IEC.

Conclusiones: La norma IEC 60909 ofrece estimaciones más conservadoras para diseños exigentes, mientras que ANSI/IEEE resulta útil en análisis preliminares, proporcionando criterios prácticos para seleccionar la norma según la criticidad del sistema.

References

[1] I. C. Choachi Gómez and Á. J. López Loaiza, “Estudio comparativo de las normas IEC 60909-0 y ANSI/IEEE 141-4 para el cálculo de corrientes de cortocircuito en instalaciones eléctricas de uso final empleando los simuladores Digsilent PowerFactory y ETAP,” Undergraduate thesis, Univ. Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11059/8426

[2] IEEE Power and Energy Society, “IEEE application guide for AC high-voltage circuit breakers >1000 Vac rated on a symmetrical current basis,” IEEE Std C37.010-2016, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.7906465

[3] International Electrotechnical Commission, “Short-circuit currents in three-phase a.c. systems – Part 0: Calculation of currents,” IEC 60909-0, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/24100

[4] R. Chelluri and M. D. Mohapatra, “Comparison of ANSI–IEC short circuit methods,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Eng., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 2182–2188, Sep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.297928

[5] S. J. Muñoz Goez and P. Mesa Beleño, “Análisis comparativo de las normas ANSI/IEEE Std C37.010-2016, IEEE Std C37.13-2015, IEEE Std C37.5-1979, IEEE Std 141-1993 and IEC 60909-2016 para el cálculo de corrientes de cortocircuito,” Undergraduate thesis, Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo, Medellín, Colombia, 2024..https://repositorio.pascualbravo.edu.co/handle/pascualbravo/2536

[6] J. Catagua and A. Valdivieso, “Análisis de cortocircuito en un sistema industrial bajo normativas ANSI e IEC, simulados en Digsilent PowerFactory,” Undergraduate thesis, Univ. Politécnica Salesiana, Ecuador, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/28685

[7] J. C. Das, Power system analysis: Short-circuit load flow and harmonics, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11021

[8] H. Arboleda, “Aplicación del análisis de flujos de carga y cortocircuito a la optimización del diseño de un sistema eléctrico industrial,” Undergraduate thesis, Univ. del Valle, Cali, Colombia, 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14330/TES01000759661

[9] M. Brenna and Y. A. M. Mohammed, “Short-circuit fault level calculation on 33/11 kV substation by using ETAP simulator according to the IEC 60909 standard,” MS thesis, Politec. di Milano, Milan, Italy, 2020. https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/166274

[10] IEEE, “IEEE recommended practice for conducting short-circuit studies and analysis of industrial and commercial power systems,” IEEE Std 3002.3-2018, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8672198

[11] R. Luo, A. Majd, and M. Devadass, “Comprehensive overview and comparisons of ANSI vs. IEC short-circuit calculations,” presented at 2018 IEEE Petrol. Chem. Ind. Tech. Conf. (PCIC), 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCIC31437.2018.9080479

[12] D. Bandaru, S. R. Sura, J. K. Bokam, and K. A. Kumar, “Methods for Short Circuit Analysis in ANSI and IEC Standards,” Int. J. Mech. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, 5487–5493, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2019.2919479

[13] D. Brankovic and R. Schuerhuber, “Short-circuit current of a hydropower plant with consideration of constant switching and fault arc voltages,” IET Gener., Transm. Distrib., vol. 18, pp. 3476-3486, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.13297

[14] A. Heyduk and J. Joostberens, “Comparative analysis of European and American standards for maximum fault current calculations on medium voltage mine power networks,” Elektron. Elektrotech., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 13–20, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eie.22.2.14608

[15] S. N. Afifi and M. Darwish, “Impact of hybrid distributed generation allocation on short circuit currents in distribution systems,” PhD dissertation, Brunel Univ., London, UK, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2014.6934697

[16] P. A. Salvatierra Villavicencio, “Simulación de una red soterrada de distribución de energía eléctrica de potencia bajo la norma IEC 60909/ANSI,” Master’s thesis, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Ecuador, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/20185

[17] Y. N. Lafta, N. A. Shalash, Y. N. Abd, and A. A. Al-Lami, “IEC 60909 and ANSI standards comparison with ASCC-based fault calculations of Iraqi power system,” Cogent Eng., vol. 6, no. 1, Art. no. 1559545, Jan. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1705654

[18] B. Niersbach, I. Ghourabi, B. Braun, and J. Hanson, “Advanced modelling of inverter-based generators for short-circuit current calculations based on IEC 60909-0:2016,” in Proc. IEEE PowerTech, Milan, Italy, 2019, pp. 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.34890/837

[19] H. Peláez Velásquez, “Análisis comparativo de las fallas simétricas aplicando las normas ANSI/IEEE C37.10 e IEC 60909 con el paquete computacional NEPLAN,” Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/11059/6033

[20] O. Álvarez Lastra, “Simulación de cortocircuitos en sistemas eléctricos de potencia usando métodos tradicionales y normativas,” Undergraduate thesis, Univ. Politécnica Salesiana, 2020. https://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/19339

[21] W. D. Mendoza Pardo and J. P. Samaniego Avalos, “Validación del programa ATP para estudios de cortocircuitos en sistemas eléctricos de potencia,” Undergraduate thesis, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Ecuador, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/24681

[22] Y. Zhang et al., “The adaptability of IEC 60909-0-2016 to power grid with voltage levels above 400 kV,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2276, no. 1, art. 012018, May 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2276/1/012018

[23] J. C. Barrantes Quesada, “Estudio de cortocircuito y coordinación de protecciones en CVG ALUNASA,” undergraduate thesis, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica, 2014.https://ruie.ucr.ac.cr/catalogo/Record/INII-UIR-CD-13557

[24] V. J. V. Bojórquez, “Estudio comparativo de las normas IEC y ANSI para cálculo de corto circuito,” Master’s thesis, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, México, D.F., México, Sept. 2007. [Online]. Available: https://www.zlibrary.to/dl/estudio-comparativo-de-las-normas-iec-y-ansi-para-calculo-de-corto-circuito

[25] S. Lakshmi Sankar and M. Mohamed Iqbal, “ANSI and IEC standards based short circuit analysis of a typical 2 × 30 MW thermal power plant,” Middle-East J. Sci. Res., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1617–1625, 2015.

[26] D. Schulz, Ed., Proceedings of the NEIS 2020 Conference on Sustainable Energy Supply and Energy Storage Systems. Berlin, Germany: VDE Verlag, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361927719

How to Cite

APA

Muñoz Goez, J., Sosapanta Salas, J. C., and Noguera-Jiménez , J. (2026). Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems. Ingeniería, 31(1), e22514. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.22514

ACM

[1]
Muñoz Goez, J. et al. 2026. Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems. Ingeniería. 31, 1 (May 2026), e22514. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.22514.

ACS

(1)
Muñoz Goez, J.; Sosapanta Salas, J. C.; Noguera-Jiménez , J. Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems. Ing. 2026, 31, e22514.

ABNT

MUÑOZ GOEZ, John; SOSAPANTA SALAS, Joseph Camilo; NOGUERA-JIMÉNEZ , Jhon. Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems. Ingeniería, [S. l.], v. 31, n. 1, p. e22514, 2026. DOI: 10.14483/23448393.22514. Disponível em: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/22514. Acesso em: 20 may. 2026.

Chicago

Muñoz Goez, John, Joseph Camilo Sosapanta Salas, and Jhon Noguera-Jiménez. 2026. “Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems”. Ingeniería 31 (1):e22514. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448393.22514.

Harvard

Muñoz Goez, J., Sosapanta Salas, J. C. and Noguera-Jiménez , J. (2026) “Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems”, Ingeniería, 31(1), p. e22514. doi: 10.14483/23448393.22514.

IEEE

[1]
J. Muñoz Goez, J. C. Sosapanta Salas, and J. Noguera-Jiménez, “Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems”, Ing., vol. 31, no. 1, p. e22514, May 2026.

MLA

Muñoz Goez, John, et al. “Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems”. Ingeniería, vol. 31, no. 1, May 2026, p. e22514, doi:10.14483/23448393.22514.

Turabian

Muñoz Goez, John, Joseph Camilo Sosapanta Salas, and Jhon Noguera-Jiménez. “Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems”. Ingeniería 31, no. 1 (May 19, 2026): e22514. Accessed May 20, 2026. https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/22514.

Vancouver

1.
Muñoz Goez J, Sosapanta Salas JC, Noguera-Jiménez J. Comparative Analysis of the Standards ANSI/IEEE C.37 and 141 and IEC 60909 for Short-Circuit Calculation in Industrial Systems. Ing. [Internet]. 2026 May 19 [cited 2026 May 20];31(1):e22514. Available from: https://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/reving/article/view/22514

Download Citation

Visitas

0

Dimensions


PlumX


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
78%
33%
Days to publication 
665
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Loading...