DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14483/23464712.24123Publicado:
2026-10-28Mapeamento das Pesquisas sobre o Modelo TPACK na Área de Química: uma Análise Bibliométrica
Mapping Research on the TPACK Model in Chemistry: A Bibliometric Analysis
Mapeo de las Investigaciones sobre el Modelo TPACK en el Área de Química: un Análisis Bibliométrico
Palabras clave:
teacher education, digital technologies, Pedagogical and Technological Content Knowledge (en).Palabras clave:
formación docente, tecnologías digitales, Conocimiento Didáctico y Tecnológico del Contenido (es).Palabras clave:
formação docente, Tecnologias Digitais, Conhecimento Tecnológico Pedagógico do Conteúdo (pt).Descargas
Resumen (pt)
Este artigo objetivou mapear e analisar a produção científica sobre a utilização do modelo TPACK na área de química, por meio de uma revisão bibliométrica, buscando caracterizar a estrutura intelectual desse campo de investigação. Para isso, adotou-se uma revisão bibliométrica de natureza exploratória-descritiva, com coleta de dados realizada em duas bases de dados: Scopus e Web of Science (WoS), utilizando os descritores “technological pedagogical content knowledge” e “chemistry”. A análise foi conduzida com o software VOSviewer (versão 1.6.20), que possibilitou a constituição e a interpretação de mapas de coautoria, coocorrência, co-citação de autores e documentos, bem como a identificação de palavras-chave emergentes. Os resultados evidenciaram a centralidade de Mishra e Koehler como referências fundacionais, além da predominância de países asiáticos, especialmente a Indonésia, na produção recente sobre TPACK em química. Também se observou o fortalecimento de redes internacionais, embora o Brasil ainda ocupe posição periférica. A discussão apontou a necessidade de maior diversidade epistemológica e de aprofundamento em dimensões específicas da disciplina, como os níveis de representação química. Conclui-se que o campo se encontra em consolidação, demandando a ampliação de estudos empíricos, instrumentos avaliativos contextualizados e diálogos críticos com teorias atuais de aprendizagem e tecnologias emergentes.
Resumen (en)
This study aimed to map and analyze the scientific production on the use of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) model in chemistry through a bibliometric review, with the purpose of characterizing the intellectual structure of this research field. To this end, a bibliometric review of an exploratory-descriptive nature was conducted, with data collected from the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases using the descriptors “technological pedagogical content knowledge” and “chemistry.” The analysis was carried out with the VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20), which enabled the construction and interpretation of co-authorship, co-occurrence, and co-citation maps of authors and documents, as well as the identification of emerging keywords. The results highlighted the centrality of Mishra and Koehler as foundational references, along with the predominance of Asian countries – particularly Indonesia – in recent TPACK research in chemistry. Strengthened international networks were also observed, although Brazil still occupies a peripheral position. The discussion emphasized the need for greater epistemological diversity and deeper exploration of discipline-specific dimensions, such as the levels of chemical representation. It is concluded that the field is still in consolidation, requiring the expansion of empirical studies, the development of contextualized assessment instruments, and critical dialogue with contemporary learning theories and emerging technologies.
Resumen (es)
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo mapear y analizar la producción científica sobre el uso del modelo TPACK en el ámbito de la química mediante una revisión bibliométrica, con el fin de caracterizar la estructura intelectual de este campo de investigación. Para ello, se adoptó una revisión bibliométrica de carácter exploratorio-descriptivo, con recolección de datos realizada en dos bases de datos, Scopus y Web of Science (WoS), utilizando los descriptores “technological pedagogical content knowledge” y “chemistry”. El análisis fue conducido con el software VOSviewer (versión 1.6.20), lo que permitió la construcción e interpretación de mapas de coautoría, coocurrencia, co-citación de autores y documentos, así como la identificación de palabras clave emergentes. Los resultados evidenciaron la centralidad de Mishra y Koehler como referencias fundacionales, además del predominio de países asiáticos, especialmente Indonesia, en la producción reciente sobre TPACK en química. También se observó el fortalecimiento de redes internacionales, aunque Brasil aún ocupa una posición periférica. La discusión señaló la necesidad de una mayor diversidad epistemológica y de un mayor enfoque en dimensiones específicas de la disciplina, como los niveles de representación química. Se concluye que el campo se encuentra en consolidación, demandando la ampliación de estudios empíricos, instrumentos evaluativos contextualizados y diálogos críticos con teorías actuales de aprendizaje y tecnologías emergentes.
Referencias
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & education, 52(1), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Assai, N. D. S., Bedin, E., & Silva, L. P. (2025). Um estudo bibliométrico sobre a resolução de problemas em química. ACTIO: Docência em Ciências, 10(1), 1-18.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122.
Bedin, E. (2026). Competências digitais docentes e políticas públicas na era da informação: por uma formação crítica, intencional e emancipatória. Texto Livre, 19, e61035. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2026.61035
Bedin, E. (2025). Metacognição e CTPC: uma nova perspectiva para a Formação Docente Reflexiva e Autorregulada. PARADIGMA, e2025013-e2025013. httpa://doi.org/10.37618/PARADIGMA.1011-2251.2025.e2025013.id1626
Bedin, E., Marques, M. S., & Cleophas, M. das G. (2023). Research on the content, technological, and pedagogical knowledge (TPACK) of chemistry teachers during remote teaching in the pandemic in the light of students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 22, 001-024. https://doi.org/10.28945/5063
Bedin, E., & Morais, C. S. L. (2024). Percepções de professores de química em formação inicial quanto à articulação tecnologia-pedagogia-ciência em suas práticas na pandemia. Educar em Revista, 40. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0411.87730.
Bedin, E., Siqueira, L. E., Lima, V. F., & Oliveira Viviani, A. C. C. (2025). Mapeando o domínio conceitual TPACK de professores em formação inicial. Singular. Sociais e Humanidades, 1(7), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.33911/singularsh.v1i7.212
Blonder, R., & Rap, S. (2017). I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 697-724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9384-6
Blonder, R., Jonatan, M., Bar-Dov, Z., Benny, N., Rap, S., & Sakhnini, S. (2013). Can You Tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their self-efficacy beliefs. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00001J
Carpendale, J., Delaney, S., & Rochette, E. (2020). Modeling meaningful chemistry teacher education online: reflections from chemistry preservice teacher educators in Australia. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2534-2543. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00718
Cetin-Dindar, A., Boz, Y., Sonmez, D. Y., & Celep, N. D. (2018). Development of pre-service chemistry teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00175D
Chakawodza, J. M., Mushayikwa, E., & Stephen, M. (2024). Exploring Challenges Influencing the Discontinued Utilisation of the Flipped Classroom Pedagogy: A Case of South Africa Underprivileged High School and Organic Chemistry. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.14
Chaves, M. C., & Aguiar, R. M. (2022). Análise bibliométrica das produções acadêmicas sobre diversidade de gênero e química. Repositório IFES.
Chittleborough, G. (2014). Learning how to teach chemistry with technology: Pre-service teachers’ experiences with integrating technology into their learning and teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9387-y
Chiu, T. K. (2025). Developing intelligent-TPACK (I-TPACK) framework from unpacking AI literacy and competency: implementation strategies and future research direction. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(7), 4189-4192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2545053
Corrêa, A. L. (2015). O ensino de ciências e as tecnologias digitais: competências para a mediação pedagógica. (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brasil.
Deng, F., Lan, W., Sun, D., & Zheng, Z. (2023). Examining pre-service chemistry teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of using data-logging in the chemistry classroom. Sustainability, 15(21), 15441. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115441
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
ElSayary, A., Al Murshidi, G., Ragab, K., & Al Zaabi, A. (2026). AI transformation in education: Examining teachers’ perceptions using an integrated TAM-TPACK-GenAI framework. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(1), ep636. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17983
Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Cambridge University Press.
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press.
Feldman-Maggor, Y., Blonder, R., & Alexandron, G. (2025). Perspectives of generative AI in chemistry education within the TPACK framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10147-3
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Godoy, L. F. (2021). Una propuesta educativa basada en el TPACK para la enseñanza, el aprendizaje y la evaluación del concepto de movimiento. Góndola, Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de las Ciencias: Góndola, Ens Aprend Cienc, 16(1), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.14483/23464712.15734
Guaita, R. I., & Gonçalves, F. P. (2022). A experimentação no ensino de química articulada às tecnologias digitais de informação e comunicação: problematizações de conhecimentos na formação de professores de Química. Química Nova, 45(6), 747-756.
Gong, X., Wei, B., Bergey, B. W., & Shockley, E. T. (2022). Unpacking chemistry teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and decisions for a PhET simulation: a TPACK perspective. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(1), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00397
Gottardo, L., & Bervian, P. V. (2024). Conhecimento tecnológico pedagógico de conteúdo na formação inicial de professores de ciências: estado do conhecimento. Góndola, Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de las Ciencias, 19(2), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.14483/23464712.20021
Hadas, B., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2023). Analysis of online assignments designed by chemistry teachers based on their knowledge and self-regulation. Chemistry Teacher International, 5(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0037
Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Figg, C. (2014). The framework of TPACK-in-practice: Designing content-centric technology professional learning contexts to develop teacher knowledge of technology-enhanced teaching (TPACK). In Technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring, developing, and assessing TPCK (pp. 137-163). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8080-9_7
Jammeh, A. L., Karegeya, C., & Ladage, S. (2024). Application of technological pedagogical content knowledge in smart classrooms: views and its effect on students' performance in chemistry. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9189-9219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12158-w
Júnior, G. G. G., Morais, C., Goes, L. F., & Costa, G. G. (2025). A proposal to integrate teacher digital competencies and professional knowledge associated with PCK and TPACK. Góndola, Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de las Ciencias, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.14483/23464712.22023
Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers' views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of science education, 24(4), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110110142
Karataş, F., & Ataç, B. A. (2025). When TPACK meets artificial intelligence: Analyzing TPACK and AI-TPACK components through structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 30(7), 8979-9004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13164-2
Karpudewan, M. (2024). Augmented reality as a platform to present green sustainable chemistry to improve preservice teachers’ competency on technological pedagogical content knowledge. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 39, 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2024.101582Get
Leite, B. S. (2021). Pesquisas sobre as tecnologias digitais no ensino de química. Debates em Educação, 13(30), 1-19.
López, A., Meneses, A., & Montenegro, M. (2025). Pre-service Teachers’ TPACK and Its Relationship to Technology Integration in Science Learning Activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(2), 436-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10201-8
Marlina, M., Rahim, A., Ria, R. P., & Hadi, H. S. (2023). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in chemistry education: A review and bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer and RStudio Applications. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 11(3), J-Chem. https://doi.org/10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v11i3.39572
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of digital learning in teacher education, 35(2), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Orel, M., Peklaj, C., & Savec, V. F. (2024). Exploring Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge as an Indicator for the Planning of In-service Teacher Training in Chemistry Education. Acta Chimica Slovenica, 71(3). https://doi.org/10.17344/acsi.2024.8783
Raihanah, D., Putri, N. M., Fatmawati, T. K., & Nurjayadi, M. (2024). Analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) ability for prospective chemistry teacher students and chemistry teachers: A literature review. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 19(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6395
Rap, S., Feldman-Maggor, Y., Aviran, E., Shvarts-Serebro, I., Easa, E., Yonai, E., Yonai, E., Waldman, R., & Blonder, R. (2020). An applied research-based approach to support chemistry teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of chemical education, 97(9), 3278-3284. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00687
Selwyn, N. (2015). Technology and education – Why it’s crucial to be critical. In S. Bulfin, N. F. Johnson, & L. Rowan (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Technology and Education (pp. 245–255). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385451_14
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X01500200
Siqueira, L. E., & Bedin, E. (2024). A incorporação do TPACK em licenciandos em Física e a sua materialização em Planos de Trabalhos de Iniciação à Docência. Revista Cocar, 21(39).
Townsend, J. (2025). TPACK model explained with examples for the classroom. Nearpod Blog. https://nearpod.com/blog/tpack/
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
Walan, S. (2020). Embracing digital technology in science classrooms-secondary school teachers’ enacted teaching and reflections on practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09828-6
Widyasari, F., Masykuri, M., Mahardiani, L., Saputro, S., & Yamtinah, S. (2022). Measuring the effect of subject-specific pedagogy on TPACK through Flipped learning in e-learning classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 1007-1030.
Yamtinah, S., Astari, M. A., Masykuri, M., & Susilowati, E. (2024). Development of Web-Based TPACK Scaffolding for Online Learning to Enhance TPACK Skills of Preservice Chemistry Teachers. Journal of Educators Online, 21(3), n3.
Yeh, Y. F., Hsu, Y. S., Wu, H. K., Hwang, F. K., & Lin, T. C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge‐practical (TPACK‐practical) through the D elphi survey technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078
Zimmermann, F., Melle, I., & Huwer, J. (2021). Developing prospective chemistry teachers’ TPACK–A comparison between students of two different universities and expertise levels regarding their TPACK self-efficacy, attitude, and lesson planning competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(6), 1863-1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01296
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 1969 Everton Bedin, Carla Morais

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Góndola, Ens Aprend Cienc. es una publicación de acceso abierto, sin cargos económicos para autores ni lectores. La publicación, consulta o descarga de los contenidos de la revista no genera costo alguno para los autores ni los lectores, toda vez que la Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas asume los gastos relacionados con edición, gestión y publicación. Los pares evaluadores no reciben retribución económica alguna por su valiosa contribución. Se entiende el trabajo de todos los actores mencionados anteriormente como un aporte al fortalecimiento y crecimiento de la comunidad investigadora en el campo de la Enseñanza de las Ciencias.
A partir del 01 de diciembre de 2018 los contenidos de la revista se publican bajo los términos de la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución–No comercial–Compartir igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0), bajo la cual otros podrán distribuir, remezclar, retocar, y crear a partir de la obra de modo no comercial, siempre y cuando den crédito y licencien sus nuevas creaciones bajo las mismas condiciones.
Los titulares de los derechos de autor son los autores y la revista Góndola, Ens Aprend Cienc. Los titulares conservan todos los derechos sin restricciones, respetando los términos de la licencia en cuanto a la consulta, descarga y distribución del material.
Cuando la obra o alguno de sus elementos se halle en el dominio público según la ley vigente aplicable, esta situación no quedará afectada por la licencia.
Asimismo, incentivamos a los autores a depositar sus contribuciones en otros repositorios institucionales y temáticos, con la certeza de que la cultura y el conocimiento es un bien de todos y para todos.






.jpg)


















